Robert Frost wrote a poem entitled “Mending Walls.” The poem is about a spring ritual of mending stone fences in
On one side of the wall were pine trees. On the other side of the wall were apple trees. What they are doing every spring is to fight against another force that wants to break down walls. Here is part of the poem:
Something there is that doesn’t love a wall,
That wants it down.
Something has knocked the stones off the wall. There is something that wants the wall down. This is the first force.
But there is another attitude which opposes it.
“My apple trees will never get across and eat the cones under his pines,” I tell him.
He only says, “Good fences make good neighbors.”
I never have quite understood that saying, but I know that we must believe it. We have spent a great deal of energy building and repairing fences.
The non-Christian public talks a lot about the exclusivity of the Christian faith – that only through Jesus can your sins be forgiven and you can get to Heaven, as though Heaven were high on the list of priorities for non-Christians. People resent that for two reasons, I think. One is the preposterous notion that good people need to be forgiven for anything, and the other is that Heaven is only for certain groups of people.
If you analyze the psychology of this thinking, you will realize that those who accuse Christians of being exclusive are really themselves the exclusive people. They are people who are proud of their goodness, as though goodness is the object of their existence. They are proud of their religiosity or even the lack thereof. They are proud of their accomplishments and their standing within the community. In fact, most of us raise our children to be proud of being good. There is nothing wrong with that, provided we teach them that any goodness we have is a gift from God or a reflection of His image.
The Christian, on the other hand, has at least some sense of the need to be forgiven perhaps even from his or her pride of goodness. The best way, then, for the exclusivist to reinforce belief in himself is to point out the Christian’s inconsistency – his arrogance or self-righteousness or even sinful behavior. The tragedy is that many times the exclusivist is right. Most sincere Christians would agree with that assessment, I suspect.
This goodness to which exclusivists seem to be called, however, doesn’t work very well, does it? Not only history but current events indicate that this world is filled with hostility of one person toward another, one group toward another and one nation toward another. Here in
In fact, I was reading the other day in an article that the
Walls are standing strong and high. We have become adept at building walls of prejudice, hostility and exclusivity between ourselves and those whom we consider not to be like the more-savvy us. Wherever and whenever there is the “us” and “them” distinction, we see walls going up.
Out text this morning deals with the hostility between Jew and Greek, the most prevalent example of the pitfalls of exclusivity perhaps in human history.
To the Jews of Jesus’ time, there were only two classes of people – Jews and Gentiles. To be a Jew was to be one of God’s chosen people. To be a Gentile was to be a heathen dog – worth nothing. Jews looked with disdain and contempt on Gentiles; Gentiles did not have warm feelings for Jews, either. Both hated the other.
The Apostle Paul turns exclusivity on its head here in the 2nd chapter of Ephesians. When he is finished, Christians become the multi-culturalists. Paul talks about a wall – a barrier – in v. 14 & 15:
For he himself (Christ) is our peace, who has made the two (Jew and Gentile) one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace, and in this one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility.
There are several interesting points to be made here. First, this wall of hostility was very evident in the wall surrounding
The second interesting point of this Scripture is that Paul defines that new “peace” that Jesus came to give. You will recall that Jesus said in farewell to His disciples in John 14:27, “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid.”
The peace that the world gives is the spreading of exclusivity – the idea that the world is divided into good and evil people and that we must strive to resolve conflict. There is nothing wrong with resolving conflict. It works for everyone. Its track record, however, is not very impressive. We are told that there were more people killed in the 20th Century than in all other wars combined in human history. Maybe so; I don’t really know who keeps those kinds of statistics.
This is not the kind of peace that Christ came to give, however. His peace is about destroying the dividing wall of hostility between Jew and non-Jew within the context of the
To put this into the context of our interest in the
My interest in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict has to do with the role that the Christian Right has been playing in exacerbating that conflict by funding settlements on the West Bank and East Jerusalem and teaching American Christians to stand behind
The things that separate us as believers in Jesus Christ have not been placed there by God. Contrary to popular belief, it is not eschatology that is driving Palestinian Christians out of their homes. The wall that I call the Concrete Curtain does not make good neighbors. The peace that Jesus came to give is inclusive of all but exclusive to the
Frost adds another couple of lines to his poem:
Before I built a wall I’d ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out.
The Middle East conflict is not about a wall planned by God to favor
Paul is very direct in addressing Christian Zionists in
Jesus has made the two peoples one by bringing outsiders into the same covenant relationship with God that had been exclusive to the Jews. He has done this by “…destroying the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility.” The wall of hostility was the law that separated us Gentiles from
What Paul is saying here is that Jesus has abolished the Old Covenant with its exclusivity. What, then, are Christian Zionists doing in promoting that Old Covenant? What are they doing in preserving a special grace for Jews when Jesus destroyed that special standing with His death on
Paul goes further by offering to you and me and Christians worldwide citizenship in the Kingdom.
He came and preached peace to you who were far away (Gentiles) and peace to those who were near (Jews). For through Him you have access to the Father by one Spirit. Consequently, you are no longer strangers and aliens, but fellow citizens with God’s people and members of God’s household, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus Himself as the chief cornerstone (vs. 17-20).
As Christians, then, our primary point of reference is Jesus Christ himself as the chief cornerstone of a common building – a holy temple – in which God has been invited to reside.
Paul was a Jew. He knew his OT well. He lived in the hope of that book and, indeed, as Saul of Tarsus, he was a zealot in preserving the exclusivity of Judaism by breathing out fire and damnation on people of the Way. Paul knew of the promises to Israel: “You are a people holy to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for his own possession, out of all the peoples that are on the face of the earth” (Deut. 14:2).
Ephesians 2 knocks such theories into a cocked hat, so to speak. The mystery of Christ is that the Gentiles are now fellow-heirs with the Jews and fellow-members of the body and fellow-partakers of the promise of God in Christ Jesus through the gospel. Once we were separated from Christ, but now Christ has drawn us in. Once we were excluded from the
The point Paul is making here is not that we move Gentiles into these blessings on a separate two-track system apart from Israel but that Gentiles and Jews move into them together on one track. The true
The New Covenant is not a replacement theology for Judaism. It is an extension of the restricted tent of God’s blessing on His human creation. The tent has been enlarged to include the Gentiles. The fullness of God’s glory and the promises to the Jews have been fulfilled in the Church of Jesus Christ. True
It is clear to me that on the Day of Pentecost, an avalanche of Jews began to enter this new
Those who were far away – the Gentiles, and those who were near – the Jews, suffered from the same problem. They were both enemies of God in their desire to be exclusive. Christ reconciled them both in one body through the cross. After centuries of animal sacrifices, Jews needed to be reconciled to God and Gentiles needed to be reconciled to God. This was not about enmity between Jews and Gentiles but was about enmity between Jews and God and Gentiles and God that needed to be overcome by the peace-making work of Jesus.
Today, we have both American Christians and Jews insisting that the good news of Christ’s reconciling work is anti-Semitism. That is a creation of the exclusive – the politically correct. Christians are not an independent body over against
The problem is that we have confused the nation-state of
In Christ, the distinction between Jew and Gentile has been abolished. The Christian, then, who insists on meddling in the
No comments:
Post a Comment